|
⚲
|
| Keyboard |
| Bayntree Wealth Advisors LLC
✚
|
|
|---|---|
| CRD # | 226708 |
| SEC # | 801-121867 |
| CIK # | 0002138457 |
| AUM | 241.1 M (2026-04-20) |
| Employees | 13 (46% Investors, 0% Brokers) |
| Fees | |
| Minimum | |
| Phone | 480-494-2750 |
| Address | 7001 North Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, AZ 85253 |
| Source | [IAPD] [EDGAR] [Website] [Twitter] [Facebook] |
| Total AUM ($M) |
|---|
| Fees and Compensation — Form ADV Part 2A (3/31/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
ITEM 5: FEES AND COMPENSATION A. Advisory Fees Bayntree charges fees to investment management clients based on a percentage of assets under management. The specific fees charged by the Firm for its advisory services will be outlined in each client’s Investment Management Agreement. For discretionary investment management clients, Advisory Fees shall typically be billed monthly, in arrears, based upon the agreed annual percentage rate. For Lincoln Financial Group accounts, Advisory Fees shall be billed quarterly, in Bayntree Wealth Advisors, LLC Form ADV Part 2A arrears, based upon the agreed annual percentage rate. The maximum annual advisory fee Bayntree charges its clients is 1.50%. When applying asset-based fees, the more assets a client has in an advisory account, the more the client will typically pay in fees, and we therefore have an incentive to encourage clients to increase the assets in their account. This incentive creates a conflict of interest. We mitigate this conflict of interest by ensuring that our recommendations are made in a client’s best interests. Although Bayntree believes its advisory fees are competitive, clients should be aware that lower fees for comparable services may be available from other sources. The fees may be negotiated by the Firm under certain circumstances, and at the sole discretion of the Firm, and will never be greater than those listed above. There is an account minimum of $100,000, which the Firm may waive at its sole discretion. For some clients, fees for services provided by third party managers (“Third Party Fees”) will be paid by Bayntree from the Advisory Fee. Fees and compensation paid to third party managers are described in more detail in the Advisory Agreement, the third party managers Disclosure Brochure, or, if applicable, in a separate disclosure Bayntree delivers to you describing customized pricing. Bayntree has a financial incentive to manage clients’ accounts ourselves rather than through third- party managers. This is because we pay third-party managers out of our annual advisory fee. Therefore, if two clients are charged the same advisory fee but one client’s account is managed by a third-party manager to whom we pay a fee while another is not, we receive higher “Net Compensation” for the account that does not involve the use of a third-party manager. Similarly, as between two accounts with the same advisory fee, an account that is managed by a third-party manager who charges a 0.3% sub-adviser fee yields a higher Net Compensation to Bayntree than an account whose sub-adviser charges a fee of 0.4%. In these examples, the term “Net Compensation” means the total advisory fee less any sub-adviser or third-party manager fee. For accounts managed without use of a third-party manager, the Net Compensation is equal to the advisory fee. However, even in accounts managed directly by Bayntree, our advisory fee and thus Net Compensation can vary depending on the strategy used and other factors as further explained below. In setting Advisory Fees, We consider the additional costs of managing the two different types of accounts – sub-advised or non-sub-advised; these costs vary over time and are rarely equal. These costs include the costs of personnel, some of which may be allocated to one type of management versus the other. Some costs to us are attributable only to sub-advised accounts and not to directly managed accounts, while other costs are attributable only to directly managed accounts and not to sub-advised accounts. In setting advisory fees we also consider client specific factors, such as the client’s age, investment experience, accessibility and similar factors that might make it more or less costly to us to service the particular client. We refer to all these program-specific and client- specific costs discussed in this paragraph as “Additional Costs.” Assuming the Additional Costs applicable to two portfolios are equal, the one that yields a higher Net Compensation to Us is also more profitable to Us. The fact that our Net Compensation varies depending on the type of account we recommend represents a conflict of interest. However, we address the conflict of interest by evaluating which of several platforms, sub-advisers, models, programs or strategies would serve the client’s best interests, and by seeking to set advisory fees designed to deliver a reasonable profit to Us, considering both external and internal costs of providing investment advice to each specific client. Bayntree Wealth Advisors, LLC Form ADV Part 2A Usually, we seek to charge advisory fees for accounts we manage without the use of a sub-adviser at lower rates than the rates we would seek to charge for a similar account managed through a sub- adviser. Because we do this, we actually receive higher Net Compensation from some sub-advised accounts than we do from some directly managed accounts. If the total Additional Costs are the same as between the two accounts, then the account managed through the sub-adviser is also more profitable to us. Because Additional Costs vary among accounts, the profitability to Us of managing accounts in one way versus another cannot be determined solely by calculating the Net Compensation We receive. Considering all the above factors, some of our sub-advised clients are more profitable than some of our directly advised clients, and some of our directly advised clients are more profitable than some of our sub-advised clients. It all depends on the client, the negotiated fee, the unique costs of supporting that client, and the total mixture of Additional Costs and all other costs that go into providing those services. Advisory Fees do not include additional fees that are the responsibility of client. Variable annuities also carry internal fees. All clients will also pay transaction fees, which are billed to the client by the custodian. Bayntree only receives its annual management fee and does not take any part of the ... |
| Account Minimums and Types of Clients — Form ADV Part 2A (3/31/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
ITEM 7: TYPES OF CLIENTS Bayntree provides investment management and financial planning services to individuals, high net-worth individuals, pension and profit sharing plans, trusts, estates, charitable organizations, and corporations. Bayntree generally requires a minimum of $500,000 of assets under management for an individual account. We may waive this minimum at our sole discretion. Bayntree Wealth Advisors, LLC Form ADV Part 2A There may be times when certain restrictions are requested by a client which would prevent Bayntree from accepting or continuing to manage the client account. Bayntree reserves the right to not accept and/or terminate management of a client’s account if it believes that the client imposed restrictions would unnecessarily limit or prevent it from meeting and/or maintaining the account’s overall investment strategy. |
| Sector | Form 13F Holdings | Value ($M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 0.3 | ||
| Healthcare Trust of America Inc | 0.3 | ||
| HCP Inc | 0.3 | ||
| United Technologies Corp /DE/ | 0.2 | ||
| Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.2 | ||
| Procter & Gamble Co | 0.2 | ||
| American Capital Agency Corp | 0.2 | ||
| Apple Inc | 0.0 | ||
| Alphabet Inc | 0.0 | ||
| Microsoft Corp | 0.0 | ||
| View All | |||
| Holdings by Sector ($M) |
|---|
| AUM Breakdown | Accounts | AUM ($M) |
|---|---|---|
| By Client Type | ||
| (a) Individuals (other than high net worth individuals) | 406 | 99.4 |
| (b) Individuals (high net worth individuals) | 104 | 141.7 |
| (c) Banking or thrift institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (d) Investment companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (e) Business development companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (f) Pooled investment vehicles | 0 | 0.0 |
| (g) Pension and profit sharing plans | 0 | 0.0 |
| (h) Charitable organizations | 0 | 0.0 |
| (i) State or municipal government entities | 0 | 0.0 |
| (j) Other investment advisers | 0 | 0.0 |
| (k) Insurance companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (l) Sovereign wealth funds and foreign official institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (m) Corporations or other businesses not listed above | 0 | 0.0 |
| (n) Other | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 1,208 | 241.1 |
| By Discretionary | ||
| Discretionary | 1,188 | 230.4 |
| Non-Discretionary | 20 | 10.7 |
| Total | 1,208 | 241.1 |
| By Non-United States Persons | ||
| Non-United States Persons | 0.0 | |
| United States Persons | 241.1 | |
| Total | 1,208 | 241.1 |
| EDGAR Form | CIK | 2011 - 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| 13F-NT | [0002138457] |
| Firm Profile (Form ADV) | |
|---|---|
| Discretionary AUM | $0.1B |
| Clients | 29 |
| Serves | Institutional, Retail, Research |
| Comparable Firms | State | AUM |
|---|---|---|
|
Rinaldi Wealth Management Inc
✚
|
FL | 243.2 M |
|
Retirewise Tax and Wealth Advisors Inc
✚
|
KS | 242.8 M |
|
210 Wealth Management Inc
✚
|
IL | 242.8 M |
|
MUNN Wealth Management LLC
✚
|
OH | 242.3 M |
|
Revolution Capital LLC
✚
|
NE | 241.9 M |
|
Carolina Financial Advisors Inc
✚
|
NC | 240.9 M |
|
Kaiyo Wealth LLC
✚
|
CA | 240.1 M |
|
Forefront Wealth Partners LLC
✚
|
TX | 239.8 M |
|
Investors Portfolio Services LLC
✚
|
WA | 238.8 M |
|
Total Wealth Planning and Management Inc
✚
|
238.8 M |