|
⚲
|
| Keyboard |
| Phocas Financial Corporation
✚
|
|
|---|---|
| CRD # | 135470 |
| SEC # | 801-64317 |
| CIK # | 0001356783 |
| AUM | 682.7 M (2026-05-12) |
| Employees | 10 (50% Investors, 0% Brokers) |
| Fees | |
| Minimum | |
| Phone | 510-523-5800 |
| Address | 1080 Marina Village Parkway Alameda, CA 94501-1001 |
| Source | [IAPD] [EDGAR] [Website] |
| Total AUM ($M) |
|---|
| Fees and Compensation — Form ADV Part 2A (4/23/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
FEES AND COMPENSATION Phocas’ fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the total market value of assets under management and are generally billed quarterly in arrears. Institutional clients are billed accordingly. Fees are negotiable and vary according to arrangements with clients. Clients may terminate an investment advisory agreement upon written notice to Phocas. In the event a client terminates an account prior to quarter-end, client will pay a prorated fee calculated to the termination date of that account. Phocas’ fees for private wealth management clients may be directly debited from their respective custodial accounts. In those cases, clients provide Phocas with written authorizations to debit advisory fees directly from their accounts. Clients are sent their fee invoices showing the amounts of the fees, the values of their assets on which the fee was based, and the specific ways our fee was calculated. The custodian is also sent a similar invoice indicating only the amount of the fees to be paid by the custodian on behalf of the client. It is the client’s responsibility to verify the fee calculations. The custodian will not determine whether fees are properly calculated. The custodian will send statements to clients, at least quarterly, indicating all amounts disbursed from accounts including the amounts of advisory fees paid directly to Phocas. Clients should contact their custodians or Phocas immediately if they do not receive statements from their custodians. Account custodians may charge fees, which are in addition to and separate from the investment advisory service fees. Custodians may charge accounts for various transaction costs, retirement plan and administration fees. In addition, some mutual fund assets deposited in the account may have been subject to deferred sales charges and 12(b)(1) fees and other mutual fund annual expenses as described in the fund’s prospectus. Advisory clients should also note that fees for comparable services vary and lower fees for comparable services may be available from other sources. Phocas’ fee schedules, subject to negotiation, are as follows: Institutional Clients ($10 Million Minimum) • U.S. Small Cap Value Strategy: 1% of assets per annum • Real Estate Investment Trusts: 1% of assets per annum • Equity Income: 1% of assets per annum Private Wealth Management Clients • 1.0% of assets per annum While the above normally applies to the private wealth management clients, Phocas may agree to different fees based upon certain circumstances such as the total amount of assets under management, the nature of such assets, services provided, and other factors. |
| Account Minimums and Types of Clients — Form ADV Part 2A (4/23/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
TYPES OF CLIENTS
Phocas’ clients include:
• Individuals;
• Pooled Investment Vehicles;
• State and/or municipal government entities;
• Corporate Plans; and
• Other Investment Advisers.
Phocas generally requires minimum account sizes of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for
Individuals and ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) for all others. Account size minimums may
be waived under certain circumstances.
METHODS OF ANALYSIS, INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISK OF LOSS
U.S. Small Capitalization Value Equity:
This strategy employs fundamental research, GICS sector-peer decile ranking algorithms, and
various ratio analyses to value investment candidates and portfolio holdings. At the portfolio
level, risk is managed by observation of fundamental information, valuations, and portfolio
diversification.
This strategy invests in U.S. small cap companies. That involves additional risks such as limited
liquidity and greater volatility. Small Cap stocks typically are more volatile than larger value
capitalization stocks, and value stocks may have lower expected growth rates in earnings and
sales than other categories of stocks.
Real Estate Investment Trusts:
This strategy depends on fundamental research, compound valuation, and various ratio analyses
to value investment candidates and portfolio holdings. At the portfolio level, risk is managed by
observation of fundamental information, and valuations.
This strategy may invest in foreign securities which involve political, economic and currency
risks, greater volatility, and differences in accounting methods. The REIT strategy is non-
diversified, meaning it may concentrate its assets in one asset class and/or fewer individual
holdings than a more diversified strategy. Therefore, the REIT strategy is more exposed to
individual stock volatility than a more diversified strategy.
Equity Income:
This strategy employs fundamental research, fundamental analysis, including balance sheet
analysis and cash flow stability, and various ratio analyses to value investment candidates and
portfolio holdings. At the portfolio level, risk is managed by observation of fundamental
information, valuations, and portfolio diversification.
This strategy may invest in foreign securities therefore involving political, economic and
currency risks, greater volatility, and differences in accounting methods. EI may also invest in
small-cap companies, which involves additional risks such as limited liquidity and greater
volatility. Small Cap stocks typically are more volatile than value stocks; however, value stocks
have lower expected growth rates in earnings and sales.
There is an inherent risk of loss of both income and principal that is associated
with investing in any securities, including mutual funds.
Data Sources Risk
Phocas subscribes to external data sources used to observe and enforce investment restrictions or
exclusion lists, to assist in making investment decisions, investment research, index creation,
pricing and valuation of securities, processing corporate actions and collateral management.
Although Phocas believes its third-party data sources to be generally reliable, if information that
Phocas receives from a third-party data source is incorrect, a client may be negatively impacted
and may not achieve desired results. Moreover, there may be time lags associated with inputting
or implementing vendor data that can impact certain processes and thereby impact Phocas’
advisory services and/or investments.
Phocas typically receives third-party data on an “as is” basis and cannot guarantee that the data
received from these sources will be accurate or timely. Phocas is not responsible for errors by
these sources.
Natural & Unavoidable Events:
Global markets are interconnected, and events like hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, forest fires
and similar natural disturbances, war, terrorism or threats of terrorism, civil disorder, public
health crises, and similar “Acts of God” events have led, and may in the future lead, to increased
short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term and wide-spread effects on the
world economies and markets generally. Clients can have exposures to countries and markets
impacted by such events, which could result in material losses.
Cybersecurity Risk:
Phocas faces a variety of cybersecurity risks that can impact operations, customers, and
reputation. Some of the most significant cybersecurity risks they navigate in their threat-
landscape include:
1) Data Breaches
Data breaches can result from a variety of sources, including cybercriminals, insider threats,
and third-party vendors. Data breaches can result in the theft or loss of sensitive information,
including customer data, intellectual property, and other confidential information.
2) Ransomware Attacks
Ransomware attacks are a type of malware that encrypts a victim's files, rendering them
inaccessible until a ransom is paid. These attacks can be devastating for financial
institutions, as they can lead to downtime, data loss, and reputational damage.
3) Phishing Attacks
Phishing attacks are a type of social engineering attack that uses email or other
communication methods to trick victims into providing sensitive information or clicking on
malicious links. These attacks can result in the theft of customer data, login credentials, and
other sensitive information.
4) Third-Party Vendor Risks
Many SEC-regulated firms rely on third-party vendors for various services, including data
processing, software development, and other IT-related services. These vendors can
introduce additional cybersecurity risks, as they may have weaker security controls or be
vulnerable to attacks.
5) Insider Threats
Insider threats are a significant risk for many financial institutions, as they can result in the
theft or misuse of sensitive information. Insider threats can come from employees,
... |
| Sector | Form 13F Holdings | Value ($M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Holdings Inc | 12.5 | ||
| Meta Financial Group Inc | 11.6 | ||
| AAR Corp | 11.1 | ||
| Wintrust Financial Corp | 11.0 | ||
| Intl FCStone Inc | 11.0 | ||
| Ducommun Inc /DE/ | 10.9 | ||
| Ameris Bancorp | 10.7 | ||
| Columbia Banking System Inc | 10.2 | ||
| Skywest Inc | 10.0 | ||
| White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd | 9.4 | ||
| View All | |||
| Holdings by Sector ($M) |
|---|
| AUM Breakdown | Accounts | AUM ($M) |
|---|---|---|
| By Client Type | ||
| (a) Individuals (other than high net worth individuals) | 18 | 57.3 |
| (b) Individuals (high net worth individuals) | 5 | 4.5 |
| (c) Banking or thrift institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (d) Investment companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (e) Business development companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (f) Pooled investment vehicles | 0 | 0.0 |
| (g) Pension and profit sharing plans | 0 | 0.0 |
| (h) Charitable organizations | 1 | 7.2 |
| (i) State or municipal government entities | 11 | 613.5 |
| (j) Other investment advisers | 0 | 0.0 |
| (k) Insurance companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (l) Sovereign wealth funds and foreign official institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (m) Corporations or other businesses not listed above | 1 | 0.3 |
| (n) Other | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 52 | 682.7 |
| By Discretionary | ||
| Discretionary | 52 | 682.7 |
| Non-Discretionary | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 52 | 682.7 |
| By Non-United States Persons | ||
| Non-United States Persons | 0.0 | |
| United States Persons | 682.7 | |
| Total | 52 | 682.7 |
| Limited Partners | 2011 - 2026 |
|---|---|
| Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions | |
| Teachers' Retirement System of the City of New York |
| EDGAR Form | CIK | 2011 - 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| 13F-HR | [0001356783] |
| Firm Profile (Form ADV) | |
|---|---|
| Discretionary AUM | $1.1B |
| Serves | Institutional, Retail |
| Comparable Firms | State | AUM |
|---|---|---|
|
Providence Wealth Advisors LLC
✚
|
IL | 684.4 M |
|
Northern Financial Advisors Inc
✚
|
MI | 684.0 M |
|
Vantage Wealth
✚
|
CA | 683.8 M |
|
Marietta Investment Partners LLC
✚
|
WI | 683.7 M |
|
High Note Wealth LLC
✚
|
MN | 683.5 M |
|
Argent Retirement Plan Advisors LLC
✚
|
LA | 683.1 M |
|
Broad Run Investment Management LLC
✚
|
VA | 681.8 M |
|
Sandbox Financial Partners LLC
✚
|
MD | 681.7 M |
|
Synergy Investment Management LLC
✚
|
FL | 681.5 M |
|
LMG Wealth Partners LLC
✚
|
LA | 681.2 M |