|
⚲
|
| Keyboard |
| Pegasus Group LLC
✚
|
|
|---|---|
| CRD # | 113499 |
| SEC # | 801-60436 |
| CIK # | |
| AUM | 91.3 M (2026-06-12) |
| Employees | 2 (100% Investors, 0% Brokers) |
| Fees | |
| Minimum | |
| Phone | 845-369-9422 |
| Address | 44 Whippany Road Morristown, NJ 07960 |
| Source | [IAPD] |
| Total AUM ($M) |
|---|
| Fees and Compensation — Form ADV Part 2A (3/21/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
Item 5 Fees and Compensation
A. The client can determine to engage the Registrant to provide discretionary investment
advisory services on a fee-only basis.
INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES
Clients can engage the Registrant, through Pegasus Asset Management to provide
discretionary investment advisory services on a fee-only basis, the Registrant’s annual
investment advisory fee shall be based upon a percentage (%) of the market value and type
of assets placed under the Registrant’s management (between 0.50% and 1.25%) as
follows:
Market Value of Portfolio % of Assets
First $1,000,000 1.25%
Next $1,000,000 1.00%
Next $1,000,000 0.75%
Over $3,000,000 0.50%
In limited circumstances, the Registrant’s investment advisory fee is negotiable at
Registrant’s sole discretion, depending upon objective and subjective factors including but
not limited to: the amount of assets to be managed; portfolio composition; the scope and
complexity of the engagement; the anticipated number of meetings and servicing needs;
related accounts; future earning capacity; anticipated future additional assets; the
professional(s) rendering the service(s); prior relationships with the Registrant and/or its
representatives, and negotiations with the client. As a result of these factors, similarly
situated clients could pay different fees, the services to be provided by the Registrant to
any particular client could be available from other advisers at lower fees, and certain clients
may have fees different than those specifically set forth above. The Registrant’s Chief
Compliance Officer, Courtney J. Barba, remains available to address any questions that a
client or prospective client may have regarding the above fee determination.
Conflict of Interest. Registrant shall generally compensate its representatives based upon
the revenues derived from accounts that they service. The representative generally
maintains the authority to determine/negotiate the percentage advisory fee. Thus, a conflict
of interest is presented because the higher the advisory fee, the greater the representative’s
(and Registrant’s) compensation.
Fee Dispersion. Registrant, in its discretion, may charge a lesser or higher investment
advisory fee, charge a flat fee, waive appliable minimum asset or minimum fee levels,
waive its fee entirely, or charge fee on a different interval, based upon certain criteria (i.e.,
anticipated future earning capacity, anticipated future additional assets, dollar amount of
assets to be managed, related accounts, account composition, complexity of the
engagement, anticipated services to be rendered, grandfathered fee schedules, employees
and family members, courtesy accounts, competition, negotiations with client, etc.). Please
Note: As a result of the above, similarly situated clients could pay different fees. In
addition, similar advisory services may be available from other investment advisers for
similar or lower fees. ANY QUESTIONS: Registrant’s Chief Compliance Officer,
Courtney J. Barba, remains available to address any questions that a client or prospective
client may have regarding advisory fees.
Margin Accounts: Risks/Conflict of Interest. Registrant does not recommend the use of
margin for investment purposes. A margin account is a brokerage account that allows
investors to borrow money to buy securities and/or for other non-investment borrowing
purposes. The broker/custodian charges the investor interest for the right to borrow money
and uses the securities as collateral. By using borrowed funds, the customer is employing
leverage that will magnify both account gains and losses. Should a client determine to use
margin, Registrant will include the entire market value of the margined assets when
computing its advisory fee. Accordingly, Registrant’s fee shall be based upon a higher
margined account value, resulting in Registrant earning a correspondingly higher advisory
fee. As a result, the potential of conflict of interest arises since Registrant may have an
economic disincentive to recommend that the client terminate the use of margin. The use
of margin can cause significant adverse financial consequences in the event of a market
correction. ANY QUESTIONS: Our Chief Compliance Officer, Courtney J. Barba,
remains available to address any questions that a client or prospective client may have
regarding the use of margin.
B. Clients may elect to have the Registrant’s advisory fees deducted from their custodial
account. Both Registrant’s Investment Advisory Agreement and the custodial/clearing
agreement may authorize the custodian to debit the account for the amount of the
Registrant’s investment advisory fee and to directly remit that management fee to the
Registrant in compliance with regulatory procedures. In the limited event that the
Registrant bills the client directly, payment is due upon receipt of the Registrant’s invoice.
The Registrant deducts fees or bills clients quarterly in advance, based upon the market
value of the assets on the last business day of the previous quarter.
C. Unless the client directs otherwise or an individual client’s circumstances require, the
Registrant generally recommends that Charles Schwab and Co., Inc., an SEC-registered
and FINRA member broker-dealer and its affiliates (“Schwab”) serve as the broker-
... |
| Account Minimums and Types of Clients — Form ADV Part 2A (3/21/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
Item 7 Types of Clients
The Registrant’s clients currently include: individuals, high net worth individuals, trusts,
estates, and business entities. The Registrant does not require a minimum annual fee or
asset level for investment advisory services. Registrant shall generally price its advisory
services based upon various objective and subjective factors. As a result, our clients could
pay diverse fees based upon the type, amount and market value of their assets, the
anticipated complexity of the engagement, the anticipated level and scope of the overall
investment advisory services to be rendered, and negotiations. Additional factors affecting
pricing can include related accounts, employee accounts, competition, and negotiations.
As a result of these factors, similarly situated clients could pay diverse fees, and the
services to be provided by Registrant to any particular client could be available from other
advisers at lower fees. All clients and prospective clients should be guided accordingly.
ANY QUESTIONS: Registrant’s Chief Compliance Officer, Courtney J. Barba, remains
available to address any questions regarding advisory fees. |
| AUM Breakdown | Accounts | AUM ($M) |
|---|---|---|
| By Client Type | ||
| (a) Individuals (other than high net worth individuals) | 4 | 1.1 |
| (b) Individuals (high net worth individuals) | 17 | 90.2 |
| (c) Banking or thrift institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (d) Investment companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (e) Business development companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (f) Pooled investment vehicles | 0 | 0.0 |
| (g) Pension and profit sharing plans | 0 | 0.0 |
| (h) Charitable organizations | 0 | 0.0 |
| (i) State or municipal government entities | 0 | 0.0 |
| (j) Other investment advisers | 0 | 0.0 |
| (k) Insurance companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (l) Sovereign wealth funds and foreign official institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (m) Corporations or other businesses not listed above | 0 | 0.0 |
| (n) Other | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 55 | 91.3 |
| By Discretionary | ||
| Discretionary | 55 | 91.3 |
| Non-Discretionary | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 55 | 91.3 |
| By Non-United States Persons | ||
| Non-United States Persons | 0.0 | |
| United States Persons | 91.3 | |
| Total | 55 | 91.3 |
| Firm Profile (Form ADV) | |
|---|---|
| Discretionary AUM | $0.0B |
| Serves | Institutional, Retail |
| Related Firms | State | AUM |
|---|---|---|
|
Pegasus Asset Management Inc
✚
|
NJ | 553.6 M |
|
Pegasus Group LLC
✚
|
NJ | 91.3 M |
|
Sports & Entertainment Investment Advisers LLC
✚
|
NY |
| Comparable Firms | State | AUM |
|---|---|---|
|
Tekmen Wells LLC
✚
|
NY | 92.4 M |
|
Woodmont Advisory Group Inc
✚
|
91.9 M | |
|
Evolutionary Tree Capital Management LLC
✚
|
VA | 91.7 M |
|
Novus Advisors LLC
✚
|
SC | 91.3 M |
|
Concert Investment Advisory LLC
✚
|
91.1 M | |
|
Algorithmic Investment Models LLC
✚
|
MA | 90.9 M |
|
Schaffer & Company Asset Management Inc
✚
|
FL | 90.8 M |
|
Weatherhelm Capital Management LLC
✚
|
NY | 90.6 M |
|
Alphaq Advisors LLC
✚
|
FL | 90.6 M |
|
Washington Square Capital Management LLC
✚
|
NY | 90.4 M |