|
⚲
|
| Keyboard |
| Torchlight Investors LLC
✚
|
|
|---|---|
| CRD # | 111289 |
| SEC # | 801-55296 |
| CIK # | |
| AUM | 5,843.9 M (2026-03-27) |
| Employees | 52 (44% Investors, 0% Brokers) |
| Fees | |
| Minimum | |
| Phone | 212-883-2800 |
| Address | 90 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 |
| Source | [IAPD] [Website] [LinkedIn] |
| Total AUM ($B) |
|---|
| Fees and Compensation — Form ADV Part 2A (3/27/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
Item 5: Fees and Compensation Investment Management Fees Torchlight is compensated for advisory services by each Torchlight Fund at the fee rates specified in the relevant Governing Agreements. The amount, timing and other terms relating to compensation are often negotiated by Torchlight with investors in Torchlight Funds and may vary significantly among Torchlight Funds and investors in a Torchlight Fund. Torchlight charges fixed rate management fees for its investment management services at an annual fee of up to 1.5% of assets under management or committed capital. Fees are payable by the Torchlight Fund on a quarterly or monthly basis in advance or in arrears. Torchlight (or an affiliate serving as general partner of a Torchlight Fund) also is entitled to receive performance fees under the terms specified in the relevant Governing Agreements. Performance fees are described in Item 6. Torchlight receives a monthly collateral management fee from the CDO at a rate of 0.0375% (0.15% per annum) of assets held by the CDO at the end of the prior month. Special Servicing and Workout Services Torchlight Loan Services, LLC (“TLS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Torchlight, performs loan work-out services, including as a “special servicer”. In its capacity as a special servicer, TLS is responsible for resolving delinquent and defaulted commercial real estate mortgage loans which are held by trusts that issue CMBS. In a CMBS trust, investors acquire certificates that are issued in classes or tranches that rank from most subordinate to most senior. Losses incurred by the trust on underlying mortgage loans are allocated to the most subordinate class outstanding (referred to as the “controlling class”). The principal amount of the subordinate class is reduced by losses allocated to that class. If the principal amount of the subordinate class is reduced to zero, subsequent losses are allocated to the next most subordinate class. The holder of the controlling class is typically afforded the right under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement (“PSA”) (the contract that governs the CMBS trust) to appoint the special servicer of the CMBS trust, since the holder of the controlling class bears the immediate risk of loss. As part of their investment strategy, Torchlight Funds (in particular, the Debt Fund series) may acquire the subordinate (or controlling) class of CMBS trusts. In those circumstances, Torchlight will appoint TLS as special servicer on behalf of the Torchlight Fund. (In certain instances, the PSA does not permit the holder of the controlling class to appoint an affiliate as special servicer, and Torchlight will appoint TLS as the “Directing Certificateholder Servicing Consultant” to perform certain functions that are typically performed by a special servicer). Torchlight believes that it is in the Torchlight Funds’ best interest to appoint TLS as special servicer, as this enables Torchlight to control the workout process and thereby maximize the trust’s (and indirectly the applicable Torchlight Fund’s) recovery on distressed loans. Torchlight encounters various conflicts of interest as a result of appointing TLS to act as special servicer on behalf of Torchlight Funds. Torchlight indirectly earns additional compensation when Torchlight appoints TLS as special servicer of a trust, thereby enabling TLS to earn special servicing fees from the trust. Consequently, Torchlight faces a conflict of interest in determining whether to acquire CMBS in Torchlight Funds that carry the immediate right to appoint a special servicer or have the potential to acquire such right in the future (due to losses incurred by more subordinate classes), as Torchlight has a financial incentive to facilitate such appointments in order to earn additional fees. Torchlight faces a similar conflict of interest in determining whether to sell such CMBS positions owned by Torchlight Funds, as such a sale could result in termination of TLS as special servicer. Torchlight seeks to make determinations as to whether to buy or sell such CMBS positions by taking into account the best interests of the Torchlight Fund without regard to the potential impact upon special servicing revenues of TLS. As special servicer, TLS is entitled to receive certain fees that are specified in the governing PSA (including periodic fees that are a percentage of the principal amount of loans in special servicing and liquidation fees that are earned as a percentage of the proceeds derived from the disposition of a loan or other asset by the special servicer) as well as certain fees the amount of which can be negotiated by the special servicer with the borrower on a case-by-case basis (such as a forbearance fee for granting a borrower additional time to achieve a milestone specified in a loan agreement). While PSAs permit the special servicer to negotiate fees to be paid by borrowers, PSAs do not specify how such fees are to be calculated and, because they are payable by the borrower, they are payable without regard to priorities specified in the PSA. More recent PSAs do require that “work-out” fees otherwise payable under the PSA be offset by borrower-paid fees, and some PSAs cap the amount of borrower-paid fees. Torchlight faces a conflict of interest in negotiating borrower-paid fees, since greater fees will result in greater revenue to TLS but could, potentially, reduce the amount that would otherwise be paid by the borrower to the CMBS trust (and, ultimately, to the Torchlight Fund). TLS endeavours to negotiate borrower-paid fees that are consistent with prevailing market practice and within the range of prevailing market rates, as determined by Torchlight in good faith. However, there can be no assurance the fees charged by TLS in any given workout do not exceed fees that would be charged by another special servicer as special servicers ... |
| Account Minimums and Types of Clients — Form ADV Part 2A (3/27/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
Item 7: Types of Clients Torchlight provides advisory services primarily to closed-ended, private investment funds that are exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) and the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”). The great majority of investors in Torchlight Funds are institutional, including public and private pension plans, insurance companies, multi-national organizations, foundations and other charitable organizations, and business organizations. The minimum capital commitment for an investor in a Torchlight Fund is typically $10 million (which Torchlight may waive at its discretion). In general, an investor in a Torchlight Fund is required to be both an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act and a “qualified purchaser” as defined in the 1940 Act. Historically, Torchlight also has managed separate accounts for institutional investors but does not manage separate accounts at the present time. The minimum size for a separate account will be negotiated on a case-by-case basis, but Torchlight typically requires a commitment from the client of $20 million to $100 million depending upon the strategy for the account. As noted above, discussions herein regarding fees and compensation, conflicts of interest, investment strategies, risk of loss, brokerage practices, review of accounts, and voting of client securities generally refer to Torchlight Funds but are applicable to clients that engage Torchlight to manage separate accounts. Torchlight provides collateral management services to a CDO. |
| Type | Form D Funds | Date | Sold | AUM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HF | Torchlight Debt Fund VIII - Distressed Co-Investments LP | [2024-05-24] | 147.5 M | 51.5 M |
| Filed 2024-03-25 (D) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Remaining Indefinite · Duration More than one year · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| HF | Torchlight Debt Fund VIII LP | [2023-02-26] | 1,051.3 M | 956.5 M |
| Filed 2024-03-22 (D/A) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Remaining Indefinite · Duration More than one year · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| HF | Torchlight Debt Fund VII LP | [2020-08-26] | 1,131.0 M | 1,900.9 M |
| Filed 2020-08-19 (D) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Remaining Indefinite · Duration More than one year · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| Other | Torchlight Value Fund Master LLC | [2020-02-26] | 0.1 M | 53.5 M |
| Offered $125,000 · Filed 2020-02-05 (D) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Minimum $1,000 · Duration One year or less · Commission $6,250 · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| HF | Torchlight Debt Fund VI LP | [2018-02-27] | 660.6 M | 1,413.0 M |
| Filed 2018-03-14 (D) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Remaining Indefinite · Duration More than one year · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| Other | Torchlight Credit Fund LLC | 2016-02-26 | 4.0 M | |
| PE | Torchlight Debt Opportunity Fund V LP | [2015-11-25] | 1,324.0 M | 71.7 M |
| Filed 2016-03-24 (D/A) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Remaining Indefinite · Duration More than one year · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| PE | Torchlight Debt Opportunity Fund IV LLC | [2013-04-01] | 941.6 M | 36.8 M |
| Filed 2014-03-27 (D/A) · Exemption 506(b), 3(c), 3(c)(7) · Minimum $5,000,000 · Remaining Indefinite · Duration More than one year · Finder's Fee $405,000 · Revenue Decline to Disclose | ||||
| HF | Aeterno Master Fund LP | 2012-03-30 | 218.7 M | |
| PE | TL Real Estate Securities Benchmark LLC | 2012-03-30 | 5.2 M | |
| View All | ||||
| AUM Breakdown | Accounts | AUM ($B) |
|---|---|---|
| By Client Type | ||
| (a) Individuals (other than high net worth individuals) | 0 | 0.0 |
| (b) Individuals (high net worth individuals) | 0 | 0.0 |
| (c) Banking or thrift institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (d) Investment companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (e) Business development companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (f) Pooled investment vehicles | 8 | 5.8 |
| (g) Pension and profit sharing plans | 0 | 0.0 |
| (h) Charitable organizations | 0 | 0.0 |
| (i) State or municipal government entities | 0 | 0.0 |
| (j) Other investment advisers | 0 | 0.0 |
| (k) Insurance companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (l) Sovereign wealth funds and foreign official institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (m) Corporations or other businesses not listed above | 0 | 0.0 |
| (n) Other | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 8 | 5.8 |
| By Discretionary | ||
| Discretionary | 7 | 5.8 |
| Non-Discretionary | 1 | 0.0 |
| Total | 8 | 5.8 |
| By Non-United States Persons | ||
| Non-United States Persons | 0.0 | |
| United States Persons | 5.8 | |
| Total | 8 | 5.8 |
| Form D Directors | Role | # Filings | # Firms | 2011 - 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Schwartz | Executive Officer | 30 | 3 | |
| Robert del Monaco | Director, Executive Officer | 9 | 2 | |
| Samuel Chang | Executive Officer | 8 | 2 | |
| Daniel Heflin | Executive Officer | 8 | 2 | |
| William Stasiulatis | Executive Officer | 5 | 2 | |
| Trevor Rozowsky | Executive Officer | 2 | 2 | |
| Marc Young | Executive Officer | 4 | 1 | |
| Vadim Blikshteyn | Executive Officer | 2 | 1 | |
| Torchlight Debt Fund VIII GP LP | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Torchlight Debt Opportunity VI GP LP | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Torchlight Debt Opportunity IV GP LLC | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Jerry Chang | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Daniel Helfin | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Torchlight Debt Fund VII GP LP | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Torchlight Debt Opportunity V GP LP | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Stephen Baines | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Joseph Cary | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 | |
| Richard Metsch | Executive Officer | 1 | 1 |
| Firm Profile (Form ADV) | |
|---|---|
| Discretionary AUM | $2.9B |
| Serves | Institutional |
| Fund Types | Hedge Fund, Private Equity |
| Comparable Firms | State | AUM |
|---|---|---|
|
Brightwood Capital Advisors LLC
✚
|
NY | 6,192.8 M |
|
PennantPark Investment Advisers LLC
✚
|
FL | 6,155.9 M |
|
Polen Capital Credit LLC
✚
|
MA | 6,129.5 M |
|
JC Flowers & Co LLC
✚
|
NY | 6,010.1 M |
|
HG VORA Capital Management LLC
✚
|
NY | 5,872.6 M |
|
Sun Capital Advisors LP
✚
|
FL | 5,843.3 M |
|
Axium Infrastructure US Inc
✚
|
NY | 5,830.4 M |
|
Saluda Grade Asset Management LLC
✚
|
NY | 5,826.7 M |
|
Fairmount Funds Management LLC
✚
|
PA | 5,799.1 M |
|
Dynamic Beta Investments LLC
✚
|
CT | 5,674.3 M |