|
⚲
|
| Keyboard |
| Mirova US LLC
✚
|
|
|---|---|
| CRD # | 300152 |
| SEC # | 801-114631 |
| CIK # | 0001802900, 0001767843 |
| AUM | 13.62 B (2026-03-26) |
| Employees | 69 (58% Investors, 3% Brokers) |
| Fees | |
| Minimum | |
| Phone | 857-305-6333 |
| Address | 888 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02199-8197 |
| Source | [IAPD] [EDGAR] [Website] [LinkedIn] |
| Total AUM ($B) |
|---|
| Fees and Compensation — Form ADV Part 2A (3/26/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
Item 5. Fees and Compensation
As compensation for the investment advisory services rendered, the Adviser receives advisory
fees (the “Advisory Fees”) pursuant to investment advisory agreements with each client that
Mirova US advises or sub-advises. The Advisory Fees are calculated based on a percentage of
average daily net assets and the details of the Advisory Fees for registered funds are publicly
available in such funds’ registration statements. The Advisory Fees schedule applicable to
institutional clients is as follows:
- 0.70% per annum if the assets under management are below $100 million;
- 0.60% per annum if the assets under management are above $100 million and below $200
million;
- 0.50% per annum if the assets under management are above $200 million, with a
minimum new account size of $50 million.
The Advisory Fee schedule applicable to Model Delivery is as follows: 0.45% per annum if the
assets under advisory are below $250 million and 0.41% per annum if the assets under advisory
are above $250 million. Certain non-US clients also pay a performance-based fee as discussed in
Item 6. The Advisory Fees payable by a particular client is subject to negotiation and may differ
from the standard fee schedules described above.
Advisory Fees for discretionary accounts are typically deducted from client assets and, for non-
discretionary accounts and sub-advised accounts, are typically billed to the client. For the funds,
fees and expenses are applied by the administrator. Billing procedures also may vary across client
accounts and are addressed in each client’s investment advisory agreement. Similarly, specific
payment and repayment arrangements that may arise upon termination of a client’s investment
advisory agreement are, if applicable, addressed in the client’s investment advisory agreement,
along with the specific terms defining which of the client’s expenses should be paid by the Adviser
out of the Advisory Fee or by the client.
When Mirova US trades on behalf of clients, the client may bear certain other expenses relating
to it, including without limitation legal, accounting, audit, brokerage, custody, transfer, registration,
trustees’ fees, directors’ and officers’ insurance, interest, taxes and extraordinary expenses, and
other similar fees and expenses, as well as any other fees or expenses incurred by the Adviser or
the client that are not specifically set forth in the client’s investment advisory agreement as being
paid by the Adviser. Expenses that would otherwise be payable by the Adviser may be reduced
through the use of “soft” or commission dollars, as discussed in Item 12 below.
For additional information regarding brokerage practices, please see Item 12 below.
As discussed above under Item 4, the Adviser has entered into personnel-sharing arrangements
with the Participating Affiliates under which the Associated Persons of the Adviser participate in
providing discretionary investment management services (including portfolio management and
trading expertise), research and related services, on behalf of the Adviser, to clients of the Adviser.
Pursuant to this arrangement, the Adviser compensates the applicable Participating Affiliate
based on the value of the services provided by the Associated Persons, provided that the
Associated Persons will not be compensated directly by the Adviser, but by the respective
Participating Affiliate, their employer. |
| Account Minimums and Types of Clients — Form ADV Part 2A (3/26/2026) [Brochure] |
|---|
Item 7. Types of Clients As of the date of this filing, the Adviser provides investment advisory services to registered US and non-US funds, separate accounts for US and non-US clients, pooled investment vehicles and provides Model Delivery to account advisers of unified managed accounts. With respect to any client that is a pooled investment vehicle, investment advice is provided directly to the pooled investment vehicle and not individually to its investors. Investment minimums for investors are set forth in the applicable registration statements, in the case of registered fund clients, and in advisory agreements and/or offering documentation, in the case of unregistered investment vehicles. Separately managed accounts and wrap programs are subject to their own investment minimums and minimum account sizes. Wrap and Model Delivery Programs The Adviser provides non-discretionary investment advisory services to a wrap program provider, investment advisers and an affiliate (Natixis Advisors, L.P.) and expects that it may in the future act as subadviser to wrap program providers (each, a “Model Delivery Recipient”). Under these arrangements, the Adviser may act as subadviser with respect to certain investment styles (“Investment Products”) that the Adviser normally offers and makes available only to its institutional and high net worth clients (or by a Participating Affiliate to clients of a Participating Affiliate). Under an investment subadvisory agreement with a Model Delivery Recipient, the Adviser may provide model investment portfolios (“Model Portfolios”) containing the Adviser’s then-current judgment as to the composition of a portfolio of securities that may appropriately be purchased for the Investment Product. The recommendations implicit in the Model Portfolios may reflect (but are not necessarily the same as) the investment recommendations and decisions being made by the Adviser for its pooled institutional and other clients within the same Investment Product (or by the Participating Affiliate for its clients). There may be differences between the Model Portfolios provided by the Adviser and recommendations, or decisions made by the Adviser for its client accounts (or by a Participating Affiliate for its clients) resulting from, among other things, differences in cash availability, investment restrictions, account sizes and other factors. Likewise, the performance of the Adviser’s client accounts (or by a Participating Affiliate for its clients) and that of the Model Delivery Recipient’s clients using the same Investment Product may differ for these and other reasons. Under these arrangements, the Model Delivery Recipient pays a fee to the Adviser based on the assets under the Model Delivery Recipient’s management. In some situations, the fee paid to the Adviser is indirectly a portion of the wrap program fee. With respect to delivery of Model Portfolios, the fee paid to the Adviser is based on the value of assets in each Investment Product for which the Adviser provides Model Portfolios and will be set forth in the applicable subadvisory agreement with the Model Delivery Recipient. Although the Adviser may provide Model Portfolios, the Model Delivery Recipient will generally have the ultimate decision making and discretionary responsibility for determining which securities are to be purchased and sold for its clients’ accounts. In most cases, however, it is expected that the Model Delivery Recipient will approve the recommendations in the Model Portfolio provided by the Adviser, subject to differences resulting from individual investment guidelines or cash, tax or other needs of its clients. To assist the Model Delivery Recipient in implementing the recommendations in the Model Portfolio, the Adviser in certain instances may, but as of the date of this document currently does not, place orders to buy or sell securities on the Model Delivery Recipient’s behalf. Unlike other client accounts, wrap and model delivery programs generally do not generate brokerage commissions that the Adviser may use to pay for research and research services (i.e., soft dollars). However, these programs may benefit from the research and research services that are used by the Adviser to assist it in its investment decision-making process, including the research and research services acquired with commissions generated by other client accounts of the Adviser or the Participating Affiliates. Therefore, except as described below, the Model Portfolios, and updates thereto, may be provided to the Model Delivery Recipient after the model portfolio adjustments have been implemented for the Adviser’s or the Participating Affiliate’s other client accounts in the same Investment Product. In such instances, the Model Delivery Recipient may trade at prices that are lower or higher than the Adviser’s (or the Participating Affiliate’s) other client accounts. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there may also be times (such as if Model Portfolios are provided to Model Delivery Recipient at the same time as the model portfolio adjustments are being implemented for the Adviser’s or the Participating Affiliate’s other client accounts) where the Model Delivery Recipient will execute client transactions that may compete with similar transactions that are directed by the Adviser or the Participating Affiliates for its client accounts in the same Investment Product at the same time, thereby possibly adversely affecting the price, amount or other terms of the trade execution for some or all of the accounts. Any effect of substantially contemporaneous market activities is likely to be most pronounced when the supply or liquidity of the security is limited. Clients of the Model Delivery Recipient should refer to their particular documentation for additional information regarding transactions for their account. |
| CIK | Period |
|---|---|
| 0001802900 0001767843 |
| Sector | Form 13F Holdings | Value ($B) |
|---|---|---|
| Nvidia Corp | 0.2 | |
| Microsoft Corp | 0.1 | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc | 0.1 | |
| ServiceNow Inc | 0.1 | |
| Synopsys Inc | 0.1 | |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.1 | |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.1 | |
| Alphabet Inc | 0.1 | |
| CrowdStrike Holdings Inc | 0.0 | |
| Bentley Systems Inc | 0.0 | |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc | 0.0 | |
| Snowflake Inc | 0.0 | |
| Waste Management Inc | 0.0 | |
| GS Acquisition Holdings Corp | 0.0 | |
| Nvent Electric PLC | 0.0 | |
| Clean Harbors Inc | 0.0 | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.0 | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 0.0 | |
| First Solar Inc | 0.0 | |
| Veralto Corp | 0.0 | |
| IDEX Corp /DE/ | 0.0 | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.0 | |
| Xylem Inc | 0.0 | |
| KLA Tencor Corp | 0.0 | |
| John Bean Technologies Corp | 0.0 | |
| Danaher Corp /DE/ | 0.0 | |
| Parametric Technology Corp | 0.0 | |
| Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd | 0.0 | |
| Elastic NV | 0.0 | |
| MongoDB Inc | 0.0 | Prev | Page 1 | Next |
| AUM Breakdown | Accounts | AUM ($B) |
|---|---|---|
| By Client Type | ||
| (a) Individuals (other than high net worth individuals) | 0 | 0.0 |
| (b) Individuals (high net worth individuals) | 0 | 0.0 |
| (c) Banking or thrift institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (d) Investment companies | 3 | 1.1 |
| (e) Business development companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (f) Pooled investment vehicles | 22 | 11.8 |
| (g) Pension and profit sharing plans | 0 | 0.0 |
| (h) Charitable organizations | 0 | 0.0 |
| (i) State or municipal government entities | 0 | 0.0 |
| (j) Other investment advisers | 0 | 0.0 |
| (k) Insurance companies | 0 | 0.0 |
| (l) Sovereign wealth funds and foreign official institutions | 0 | 0.0 |
| (m) Corporations or other businesses not listed above | 0 | 0.0 |
| (n) Other | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 25 | 12.9 |
| By Discretionary | ||
| Discretionary | 25 | 12.9 |
| Non-Discretionary | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 25 | 12.9 |
| By Non-United States Persons | ||
| Non-United States Persons | 11.8 | |
| United States Persons | 1.1 | |
| Total | 25 | 12.9 |
| EDGAR Form | CIK | 2011 - 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| 13F-HR | [0001767843] | |
| 13F-HR | [0001802900] |
| Firm Profile (Form ADV) | |
|---|---|
| Clients | 9 (84 non-US) |
| Serves | Institutional |
| LEI | 2549004Y6OUG0NDWJ657 |
| Comparable Firms | State | AUM |
|---|---|---|
|
Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania
✚
|
PA | 14.25 B |
|
Amova Asset Management Asia Limited
✚
|
14.23 B | |
|
Oaktree Fund Advisors LLC
✚
|
CA | 14.10 B |
|
Franklin Advisory Services LLC
✚
|
FL | 14.07 B |
|
Capacuity LLC
✚
|
FL | 13.87 B |
|
Comgest Asset Management International Limited
✚
|
13.66 B | |
|
First Sentier Investors UK IM Limited
✚
|
13.27 B | |
|
Redding Ridge Asset Management UK LLP
✚
|
13.23 B | |
|
Smith Capital Investors LLC
✚
|
CO | 13.11 B |
|
Devenir Investment Advisors LLC
✚
|
MN | 12.99 B |